Back to the simulator

Sector simulation

Change the structure. Watch the year change.

A fictional organisation in your sector, a year of decisions by synthetic deciders who follow their scorecards. Move a decision right, add a hand-off or change a measure, and compare with the typical structure on the same year.

A fictional B2B software company with about 25 million euros of annual recurring revenue.

Scorecards vs the real result

Scorecards show how the decisions compare with ordinary practice (100% = ordinary practice). The real result is this year's cumulative illustrative value in EUR.

The deciders' scorecards say

107% of ordinary practice

Real result in the year

€2,556,637

Scorecards say 107% of ordinary practice; the real result is EUR 2,556,637.

Deciders' scorecards (100% = ordinary practice)
Deciders' scorecards (100% = ordinary practice)02652
Real result (EUR, cumulative, illustrative)
Real result (EUR, cumulative, illustrative)02652

Real result €2,556,637 in the year, -€11,509 after it, against €3,602,123 if every occasion had been decided best for the organisation.

71% of the best possible.

Who decides
Who is measured on what
Hand-offs and checks
Culture: who works here

A mix of dispositions. Each role draws one, kept all year, and the same people appear in every structure you compare.

Mix: 35% conformers, 35% stewards, 15% entrepreneurs, 15% gamers

Synthetic dispositions, not measured people.

Setting

Where value was lost, and why

  • Product and Engineering decided on roadmap priorities without recurring support issues: 10 times, €400,442 lost against the best option.
  • Customer Success saw enough but chose for its own scorecard on renewal and expansion terms: 14 times, €345,885.
  • Sales decided on deal terms and discounts without the onboarding capacity: 8 times, €146,487 lost against the best option.
  • Marketing decided on lead qualification without what happened to past leads: 16 times, €108,033 lost against the best option.
  • Judgement calls on renewal and expansion terms by Customer Success that missed the best option: 3 times, €31,095.
  • Judgement calls on support prioritisation by Support that missed the best option: 19 times, €25,053.

What was chosen

  • Deal terms and discounts · Sales · Steward: puts the organisation first and follows the rules

    close on standard terms ×44 · close by promising custom onboarding ×8

  • Lead qualification · Marketing · Entrepreneur: puts the organisation first and bends process rules when it sees value

    pass on only well-qualified leads ×10 · pass on leads still being nurtured ×5 · pass on every lead to hit the volume ×11

  • Roadmap priorities · Product and Engineering · Entrepreneur: puts the organisation first and bends process rules when it sees value

    balance new features and fixes ×10 · fix the issues customers keep reporting ×3

  • Support prioritisation · Support · Steward: puts the organisation first and follows the rules

    diagnose each ticket properly ×19 · escalate root causes to engineering ×33

  • Renewal and expansion terms · Customer Success · Gamer: puts its scorecard first and uses whatever the measure allows

    renew at the current price ×3 · offer every customer a renewal discount ×14 · tailor the offer to how the customer uses the product ×9

About this simulation

All amounts are illustrative euros for a fictional organisation; they show the direction and the size of a trade-off, not an estimate for any real organisation.

  • Deal, renewal and roadmap sizes and every option effect are assumptions for a fictional company, not measurements.
  • An overpromised onboarding shows up about ten weeks later as churn risk; lead quality about four weeks later in sales time.
  • Consequences of the year's decisions that arrive after it ends are counted separately, not in the weekly chart.

In the vocabulary but not simulated yet: revenue forecast.

The deciders are synthetic: each follows its own scorecard, sees a delayed consequence only when the information carrying it reaches it, and sometimes does not choose its best option.